Why you shouldn’t write your scripts in the same way Arsenal play football May 28, 2009
Posted by James D Hartland in First Draft, Index Cards, Rewriting, Theory.add a comment
If I may use a sporting analogy to describe something in Screenwriting…
I’m not the worlds biggest football fan, in fact I only really have a vague passing interest in it, but from the football matches I have seen on the telly there seems to be a couple of stock phrases used to describe when a team is trying too hard to play really pretty football at the expense of actually beating the other team.”Trying to walk the ball into the back of the net” and “Looking to score the perfect goal” are two such phrases.
I.e. the team is trying to use all their creativity and technical ability to outplay the other team when they would be better off if they just ran as fast as they can towards the goal and smashed the ball at the goalkeeper.
The reason I mention this is because I think its a pretty good analogy to the way I approach writing my scripts and partly explains why I get bogged down in the rewriting process. Essentially, I am always looking to come up with the perfect structured story before I start writing. In the same way a footballer should be speculative and just blast the ball at the keeper every now and then, a writer should be speculative and just write something down even if he doesn’t quite know what the outcome will be.
Getting bogged down
In the past I’ve been very much of the attitude that to write effectively you need to pre-plan every beat of the script before you write it (the index card approach), but sometimes when you don’t have all the answers, sticking vehemently to this approach can just hold you back. You can find yourself in a position where although your intentions of having every beat worked out beforehand is a good one, you would actually be making way more progress if you just started writing down what you already had.
The common consensus is your screenplay is doomed if you don’t have the ending worked out for example, but if you have a really great opening half and no idea what the ending is, at what point should you give up on trying to pre-plan an ending and instead just write what you already have in the hope it spurs new ideas? If all you did was theorise about potential endings then you might find yourself bogged down and going around in circles for months, something I can attest to doing.
But at the same time, you really are better off if you know the ending before hand, so maybe you should hold off writing that little bit longer?
I guess what I am saying is you need to find the right balance between making progress regardless what crap you put down on the page, and being more considered in what you put down on the page; and that ultimately making progress should come out slightly ahead in the ratio.
First Drafts
For me this is mostly a problem I encounter in the rewriting process, I never really fall into this trap on first drafts because I have developed a way of doing first drafts that I really enjoy.
When I do the first draft I basically write a half page synopsis of my film and then I expand it into a longer synopsis simply by adding more details. I’ll expand the most vague areas further to make it a 4 page outline, and so on and so forth until it is a 10 page treatment, a 20 page treatment and eventually I get to the point where I am ready to just add slug lines and dialogue to turn it into a finished script.
I am very much mindful of theory and structure throughout this whole process, it is far from free-form writing, but none the less I work in a very organic way. All I am ever doing at any point is making what is already there a little bit more detailed and a little bit more focused. My synopsis and my 120 page screenplay are one and the same document just at different stages in their fluid life.
I love this method of working because it doesn’t feel like you are ever starting a script from a blank page, you are always building upon something, even if it started off from a simple 1 sentence log line which you expanded and expanded and expanded. Everyone has at least a few rough ideas of scenes and a general structure for the thing, just write this down and then you will be surprised how easy it is to expand it with more details.
At the same time doing it like this still forces you to get everything sorted before you start writing the full screenplay. I am still planning all my character arcs and story beats in the same way I would if I had a pile of index cards, its just I am doing that planning in a more organic, fluid document.
When it comes to planning the subsequent drafts however there is none of this organic growth, instead it becomes a much more mechanical, analytical job of making changes that slot into the already completed script. I get in the mindset of “You’ve done the whole ‘getting it down on the page’ draft, now you need to make sure all the structure, character arcs and everything else is water tight before you move forward again, otherwise you wont be making things better just different”.
Aiming to work out every nuance before you write is great (this is what you should aim for ideally), but ultimately making progress needs to come at some point and that might mean starting to write with only some of the changes planned out. I am trying to make each subsequent draft the final draft, the perfect version of my script, when in reality every draft is more or less a ‘get it down on the page’ draft. It’s just that each time you do this it becomes more focused and less crap.
I am trying to walk the ball into the back of the net.
An Example
In the past I’ve gotten really bogged down in rewriting my Romcom, never really finding a coherent plan of how I was going to overhaul it and being reluctant to start making any changes until I did. One change I had in mind for ages was to make the female character a lot more of a panic-stricken, always worrying about her school grades type character. She is good in school but the fear of ever failing terrifies her. I’ve yet to make this change though because I don’t yet have anything more than a vague idea how it would play out over the whole film.
I didn’t want to end up with a script that set stuff up in the first act but then didn’t carry it throughout the whole story (something I’ve been guilty of in the past); but after ages of trying to come up with the whole structure and very little progress being made, then I need to realise that making some progress is better than none at all.
I was always of the attitude that if I just kept theorising I would eventually come up with the answers, and waiting for those answers would be better in the long run than writing only half the solution straight away …I was trying to walk the ball into the back of the net.
However, these past few weeks I have been working on another film that needed rewriting and with that film I just started making what few changes I had in mind even if I didn’t have the ‘big picture’ worked out yet; Through the process of doing those few changes I came up with a few more changes and everything eventually snowballed into a new much different, improved draft. Had I just sat there planning my rewrites out without ever starting, waiting for the big picture to come to me I think I would have just been going around in circles for months.

A picture I came across on a software coding website that kinda sums up the trap.
On the flip side…
Taken to the extreme, writing your script with a total “I’m gunna just get something down on the page” attitude with no pre-planning or sense of goal is going to end in failure. I still believe whole heartedly in making notes before you make any changes and using screenwriting theory to best structure your work. If we go back to the sporting analogy, there is such a thing as “playing the long ball” where a team will just blast the ball up field and hope something happens from it. It’s finding that right balance between the two approaches that wins matches and writing is no different.
I guess as individual writers we need to learn to find the signals that tell us when we have passed the point of meaninful analysis and should now just jump straight in regardless. Quite often it might be a deadline that dictates this time allocation for you, but if not then you need to know when to write and when to stop and think, and knowing that only comes from experience.
Like I always say, learning to become a better writer is as much about learning how to get the best out of yourself as it is learning how to write more engaging scripts. If we go back to the sporting analogy one last time, people will talk about how good football managers know the exact right approach to get the best out of each individual player in a squad of very different personalities. You need to learn how to be a great coach to your own individual personality.
Paul Abbott, writing genius and time traveler July 12, 2008
Posted by James D Hartland in BBC Writer's Room, Northern Screenwriter Conference, Paul Abbot, Paul Abbott, Quotes, Rants, Rewriting.1 comment so far
![]()
I’ve been to a few BBC Writer’s Room events in the past year and they always quote this thing Paul Abbott said.
Writing is rewriting
Not only is this quote attributed to him up on their website, but it’s also printed on the little postcards and booklets they give you when you go to any of their events, and at the Northern Screenwriters Conference a woman from the Writer’s Room talked about Paul Abbott using this phrase in such a way that if you didn’t know better you would think he invented it.
I don’t want to live up to my reputation as a moaning git, but come on. How can you possibly attribute the oldest quote about writing in the entire universe to Paul Abbott? It always bugs me when I ever see this printed on the Writer’s Room stuff. He did not coin this phrase. OK so he might have said it once, hell he might say it all the freaking time, but does the guy really need his name under the quote? Do the BBC think that unless its attributed to someone we have heard of we wont believe it?
Everytime I see it I just wanna say “Paul Abbott did not coin that phrase!!!”
I did a quick google to find out who was the first person to use this phrase as I’m sure it was Hemingway or some one like that back in the day. I couldnt find a definitive answer, so if someone else knows who said it first please leave a comment.
What I do know though is unless Paul Abbott has a time machine he didn’t say it first!
Of course I’m sure if you actually met Paul Abbott he would be the first to say that this is an age old phrase, which just makes the Writer’s Room quote seem all the more daft.
/End Rant.
LA Features Draft 2 January 10, 2008
Posted by James D Hartland in Horror, LA Features, Rewriting, Romcom, Wendall Thomas.1 comment so far
Well today was the day I was supposed to get some notes from Wendall Thomas on my second draft of my LA Features script, and sure enough when I woke up this morning there was a 12 page set of notes from Wendall waiting for me in my inbox.
It’s full of loads of things I need to change, but in a way it was a kinda positive thing to read because her list of problems are for the most part ones I am all too aware of; things that I felt needed changing anyways or all the bits I knew I was kinda fudging and hoping no one will notice. It’s nice to know you aren’t way off the mark in your own personal judgement.
Of course knowing where the problems are and knowing how to fix those problems are two different things and that’s where Wendall is going to be invaluable to me. Some of these problems have been in the screenplay since day one and I’ve yet to find solutions for them, but already just reading the notes has given me a bunch of ideas for things I’ve never thought of before but which might well be the answer to all my problems.
I could go through all the other major points of interest like how my character’s aren’t flawed enough, how I need more conflict in the end of the script and much more, but I’m not sure exactly how much use that will be to anyone, or if anyone even cares. But I guess if I stumble upon some major discovery like I feel I’ve worked out the secret of how to write flawed characters or something then I guess I’ll write a blog entry about it.
One note I do wanna mention though, because it’s a bit more general about me as a writer rather than the specific script, was her comment that my writing style is too dense.
I had already suspected that my writing style was perhaps a bit too dense with me writing very detailed descriptions when it wasn’t always needed, which is why I decided this year I’m gunna make a concerted effort to read more screenplays and get a better sense of economy in my description. (As mentioned in my new year resolutions.) It’s nice to finally know one way or the other if I’m worrying over nothing or as I suspected it’s something that I need to address in order to work in the LA industry.
I’ve now got 42 days or 6 weeks until I need to hand in the 3rd draft, so I guess from today I need to stop working on my horror film and get back to work on my LA Features romcom.
I’m pretty pleased with my horror film so far, but there’s a long way to go with it yet. The bit I’m struggling with at the moment are the specifics. Like it’s easy to say “right at this point I want her to be chased by the killer”, but to actually fill in the specifics of that is very hard. It’s such a set piece kind of a moment that you’ve really gotta think moment by moment what is gunna happen and how that can be original and engaging.
I think I’m gunna stop worrying about it so much and just put something down even if it sucks. Writing is rewriting after all.
Someone is about to read my first draft. Oh No!! August 15, 2007
Posted by James D Hartland in Career, First Draft, LA Features, Rants, Rewriting, Romcom.1 comment so far
Well, I finally got my first draft of my rom-com finished this week. What do I think of my first draft? I think it sucks big time. But then again, if I thought it was really good then I would be far more worried!
I think the characters arcs are pretty non-existent at the moment, the dialogue is lame, the ending just sorta flops to an end… I could go on, but point is; I think the script in general is really poo.
Anyone who has read my Sometimes Shit is Good blog entry will know that I don’t really worry so much about first drafts being crap, but this time things were different. This time I was applying for a mentoring scheme with my first draft, and in doing so I have broken the first rule of screenwriting… Never show anyone* your early rough drafts!
*Friends and family don’t count.
OK that’s not strictly true, since the whole point of this mentoring scheme was to hand in an early draft and to then hopefully get help in rewriting it over the coming months. So its not like I committed a cardinal sin and handed in a rough draft rather than a finished, polished, super rewritten draft.
I just wish I could have handed a draft that wasn’t quite so early in its development, but fact is I had to rush just to get a finished draft down of any kind.
The problem is obviously that they might read the script and think I’m not good enough for this mentoring scheme when in fact I am a total genius and it just so happens that part of my writing process on the way to writing a finished masterpiece is for me to do a really banal and sloppy first draft; where as someone else applying who gets a place instead of me might hand in a really great initial script but not have any clue how they are going to take it any further forward.
That’s the frustrating part. I wish I could say to the reader “excuse me, you have probably noticed that my protagonists character arc is pretty rubbish at the moment, this isnt because I don’t know how to write, it’s just because if the deadline had been a couple of months later all this crap would have been fixed”.
I guess that’s the crux of the matter… If some people are handing in a draft that has already been rewritten a few times and I’m handing in what is literally my “get it down on the paper regardless draft” will I come off looking bad in comparison?
It’s not like they are after the finished product, the whole point of the scheme is to receive writers early drafts and pick the best writers to help develop their rewrites over the coming year… but one man’s first draft is another man’s 8th draft, and there in lies the problem.
Oh well, there’s nothing I can do about it now except wait and hope I get at least an interview. Because getting an interview = being able to give them some context about the state of play on this draft.
PS. In case you were wondering what’s with the picture, its because now I’ve finished that first uber shite draft in time for the deadline I now have time to go get a shave. For anyone who knows me in person perhaps looking at my facial hair is a good indication of how busy I have been lately.
Lastly, I’d also like to to do a shout out to Ben, Steve, Justin and Emmie for their help finding typos and suggesting last minute changes. Thank you for your help. I know you are reading this.
48 hour screenwriting challange May 30, 2007
Posted by James D Hartland in 2 day Screenplay, First Draft, Horror, John Hughes, Rewriting, Writer's Lifestyle.Tags: , 2 day Screenplay, First Draft, Horror, John Hughes, Rewriting
1 comment so far
If you look at the trivia for all of John Hughes’ teen movies at some point you will be told that he wrote the movie in two days. 16 candles, Weird Science, Breakfast Club, Ferris Buella’s Day Off… all of these movies were apparently written in just 2 days each.
Now firstly, is this trivia accurate? I could believe it maybe once, but its listed for several of his films…. so has it somehow been confused over the years which films he wrote in 2 days, resulting in all of them now being thought of as 2 days films?
Secondly, what the hell does that even mean to write a screenplay in 2 days? I presume that means the first draft, but then how long can one rewrite that first draft and still claim it was written in 2 days? If I wrote a first draft in 2 days and then spent 2 years rewriting it then its not a 2 day movie. And I cant believe he didn’t rewrite the scripts at all, he must have at least tweaked them?
And lets say that he didn’t do any rewrites, did he at least have the idea all thought out before he sat down to write it? Or did he really just splurge out a whole screenplay from scratch in just 2 days?
I’m not sure I believe any of these two day statements to be true. I mean, why is it always two days? Why isn’t it three days for at least one of them? Why always two? Is this just some urban myth? I must admit I don’t really know enough to say one way or the other.
But it’s got me thinking…
Just how much work could you do in a single weekend?
If you had the basic idea for a film, possibly the main story beats planned out, and you sat down first thing on Saturday morning and just wrote and wrote and wrote all weekend, just what could be the result of that?
I think for most of us the result would probably stink, but then again, you would at least have the basis of a story which you could then rewrite.
As someone who has spent months index carding and planning a film, the idea of just bashing out something in a few days sounds terribly exciting, and you never know, it might just work. And hell, even if it doesn’t, maybe it will purge your soul ready for another 6 months of index cards and planning!
I’ve got this idea for a really cheesy horror-comedy, (Think “Snakes on a Plane” or “Black Sheep” but more comedic), and you know what? …. Since its supposed to be shlocky, and since I dont need beautifully rendered character arcs, and since being dumb is part of its charm; I think I might just try this 48 hour challenge and see how far I can get.
I don’t think I would attempt to write a whole screenplay in that time with full dialogue and the works, but I would like to think that I could bash out 50 pages of crude treatment style description, and that would be enough to get the ball rolling.
Sometimes shit is good January 28, 2007
Posted by James D Hartland in First Draft, Index Cards, Rewriting, Writer's Hangups.1 comment so far
The famed theatre director Harold Clurman once said “bad work is the manure from which good work emerges.” He was talking about the crap plays on Broadway at the time, but I think this is a wonderful quote for Writers to take note of and learn from.
Your initial idea, often called the seed of the idea is in fact, for the purpose of this metaphor, a SEED, and for a seed to grow from a tiny little thing into a big strong PLANT (screenplay) it needs MANURE. What is manure? Well its shit, both in the real world and for the purposes of this metaphorical theory. Basically to make your seed grow you need to throw as much shit on it as possible, because leaving your seed to grow with no added nutrients wont work. As you heap shit onto your seed over time the plant will grow bigger and the stronger.
Why do I love this idea so much? Because it gives you licence to come up with shit. It makes it OK for you to sleep at night without feeling guilty that all you gave your seed today was endless shit, because you know what? After your seed has festered under all that shit over night, or maybe for a couple of days, it will start to grow into a plant. Your seed wont grow at any where near the same rate if you don’t put any manure on it, so it teaches you to not be so precious about your ideas at the expense of never making progress.
How cool is that? This simple analogy gives writers permission to write stuff that isn’t perfect. And since battling with your own insecurities and personal battles is half the struggle of screenwriting, by eliminating the guilt associated with only having crap ideas it frees you up to come up with great ones!
Many of the hang ups writers face are simply cured by removing the guilt attached to those feelings… removing the guilt from procrastination, removing the guilt from writing blocks, etc, The knack is just knowing how to remove that guilt, and in learning the seed and the shit theory I believe everyone can remove those negative feels about the crap you come up with.
In the past I used to worry endlessly about whether I should put an idea down or not, does it fit or not, will it work or not. Now I just make a note of the idea and move on, because now I know that simply having that shit out of my head and festering on the seed is going to help it grow.
I have a terrible first draft feature film sitting in my drawer at the moment which I need to get on with soon, but the fact that its terrible has never bothered me in the slightest, because I knew it was always the start of a long process, and simply by having a first draft, as shit as it may be, I am now in a much stronger position to go forward and write the killer feature than if I had stalled and waited for all the good ideas to turn up.
Actually, I’m going to take a moment out here to say that I don’t really condone people writing without proper planning. I think that nearly everyone will benefit from planning the film properly before they sit down and write it. What I am NOT saying here is that you should go and write the first page of your screenplay with the first idea you have and worry about fixing it later. What I am saying is that that you should start your PLANNING with the first idea that comes into your head, and continue to come up with new ideas regardless how crap until you have enough good ideas to write a screenplay that no longer sucks. When I talk about a seed I really do mean the early stages of your ideas life cycle. Actually writing the first page of the script proper usually comes months into the plants life.
Anyways, that aside, my main point in this blog is to comment on the fact that a lot of writers I’ve met in the amateur bracket let the fact that their first draft sucks get to them (but I am sure it is something that comes to haunt professionals from time to time as well). They don’t realise two things… Writing IS rewriting (first drafts of anything suck), and your seed needs shit. When you realise these two things you come to discover that actually writing a terrible first draft is a strangely liberating experience, because now you have gotten all that shit out of your system and onto the seed where its needed, now you have a healthy young plant and you can go forth and write the killer second draft.
My Blogs suck :-( January 3, 2007
Posted by James D Hartland in Personal, Rants, Rewriting, Site News.add a comment

In order to procrastinate from doing any real work I decided to read some of my older blogs and man! They would have benefited from a second draft! ….They are kinda clunky.
This basically comes from the fact that I write these blog entries as one super fast splurge of ranting, usually while waiting for my food to cook. In my defence though, I’d like to think that my blog shouldn’t come across as too wonderfully polished, otherwise people might suspect that I’ve been putting more effort into my blog than my actual screenwriting!
Anyways, I just wanted people to know this because I don’t want people getting the wrong impression from a few bad typos and a general manic dumping of ideas.
Interestingly enough, my next blog entry is going to be about dealing with first drafts and the fact that they inevitably suck, so watch out for that some time soon.
