jump to navigation

We don’t know jack about TV September 24, 2009

Posted by James D Hartland in BBC, BBC Writer's Room, Seminars, TV, Television, Training, UK Film Council.
5 comments

televisionI attended another two days of seminars his past week, and as ever they were about feature films.  I must have gone to 20 such events in the past few years, all about feature film writing, all provided for free from my local screen agency.

The problem is, here in the UK, everyone agrees that TV is where a writer stands the best chance of making a living from their craft, and that even if you did go on to make films you would probably work on a TV show at some point.

So where are the TV seminars?

I’d like to think I’m almost an expert on film structure by now, in part because I have gone to so many of these seminars; but I couldn’t begin to tell you what is the best way to deal with character development over several series of a TV show, or what is the best way to structure an episode into acts or sequences to best maximise the format; other than using my gut instinct of course. It seems to me like there is a massive training shortage on this sort of thing.

At least from my perspective.

Maybe if I was in a different part of the country there would be loads of this training, but here in the North East there hasn’t been diddly. The BBC do a couple of mentoring schemes for writers based in the north, but that is kinda too little too late because by the time you get on one of those schemes you are already a really good writer well on your way to being a professional.

Where are the grass roots training schemes? Why aren’t there more seminars that do “TV drama structure 101″. The BBC or who ever could get 100 writers at a time and tell them everything they need to know to go away and write a nicely structured show. I mean this is essentially what these Film seminars are aimed at doing, just raising the grass roots level of knowledge on how to write a good feature film. They don’t set out to turn you into the finished article.

It just seems crazy to me that I know shit loads more about how Hollywood writes its scripts than I do about my own country’s TV, which like I say, is most writers’ best chance of making a living as a screenwriter.

I guess the problem stems from there being a Film Council to oversee the development of the Uk Film industry but there’s not really a TV Council over seeing the development of Television in the same capacity. But there are some funding bodies out there providing training for Television so there’s no excuse for why I should be able to go to 20 film seminars and only 1 TV seminar in the same time period.

That said, my own personal lack of knowledge on TV writing also stems from the bias of screenwriting books to deal with feature films. I must own 20 books on films but only one or two that are applicable to TV. In fact I can’t really remember anyone ever recommending me a single TV book to pick up. Everyone just reads books about feature films it seems.

In fact, consider this a shout out… anyone who knows a good book about writing TV drama leave a comment below. Realising there is this training gap I’d really love to go away and learn all about TV writing.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
AddThis Feed Button

How to become a professional screenwriter in the UK – The Abridged Version (which also contains the meaning of life as a special bonus) July 31, 2008

Posted by James D Hartland in Career, Funding, NFM, Northern Film and Media, Screen Agencies, Screen Agency, Training.
add a comment

The other day I got an email from someone…

James,

Sounds like you are doing really well in screenwriting circles and was hoping for some advice.

I’ve currently got a short film being made by a small production company within the next few months. Also another script then want to do soon after and another that I just need to get financed for next year.

I still have a full-time job in sales and want to dedicate my life to something I love as finding as it’s difficult managing the time to write. I’m sure you understand how frustrating it is. Any ideas?

I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you very much.

The one piece of advice I always give to everyone is to get in bed with your local Screen Agency.

These guys are the gatekeepers to all the funding and training opportunities in the UK industry, and since they are also the gatekeepers for all the directors and production companies as well, it means they can help you foster relationships with other important industry professionals. Developing a good relationship with your Screen Agency is crucial to becoming a writer, or least it was for me since literally every bit of training and work experience I have gotten in the industry be it as a runner or as a writer has come either directly or indirectly from my local Screen Agency.

It’s that simple.

Write as often as you can, write as good as you can, but make sure your screen agency knows who you are, and make sure you know all the schemes your screen agency has to offer you.

There’s no secret formulas to it. Just write good stuff and use the resources at the screen agencies to get ahead. This is all I have done.

Use these contact details below to get in touch with them ASAP if you haven’t already.

As for finding the time, you’ve just got to make the time, even if that means changing your lifestyle and making sacrifices. If that means changing to a part time job, selling your car and giving up all your nights out for a year or two is that not a small price to pay for working at your dream job?

Too many people worry about shit that frankly shouldn’t matter. Just seize the day! Be bold. It doesn’t matter if you fail. What sucks is becoming a slave to the wage.

If you have any doubts about the meaning of life watch this.

East of England

Screen East
2 Millennium Plain
Norwich
NR1 3JG
Tel: 01603 776 920
Fax: 01603 767191

Website:Screen East
email:info@screeneast.co.uk


East Midlands

EM Media
35-37 St Mary’s Gate
Nottingham
NG1 1PU
Tel: 0115 934 9090
Fax: 0115 950 0988

Website: EM Media
email:info@em-media.org.uk

London

Film London
Suite 6.10, The Tea Building
56 Shoreditch High Street
London
E1 6JJ
Tel: 020 7613 7676
Fax 020 7613 7677

Website:Film London
email:info@filmlondon.org.uk

North East

Northern Film and Media
Central Square
Forth Street
Newcastle-upon-Tyne
NE1 3PJ
Tel: 0191 269 9200
Fax: 0191 269 9213

Website:Northern Film & Media
email: info@northernmedia.org

North West

North West Vision & Media
C/O BBC
Oxford Road
Manchester
M60 1SJ
Tel: 0870 609 4481
Fax: 0161 244 3755

Website:North West Vision
email:info@northwestvision.co.uk

South East

Screen South
The Wedge
75 – 81 Tontine Street
Folkestone
Kent
CT20 1JR
Tel: 01303 259 777
Fax: 01303 259 786

email: info@screensouth.co.uk
Website:Screen South

South West

South West Screen
St Bartholomews Court
Lewins Mead
Bristol
BS1 5BT
Tel: 0117 952 9977
Fax: 0117 952 9988

email:info@swscreen.co.uk
Website:South West Screen

West Midlands

Screen West Midlands
9 Regent Place
Birmingham
B1 3NJ
Tel: 0121 265 7120
Fax: 0121 265 7180

email: info@screenwm.co.uk
Website:Screen West Midlands

Yorkshire and the Humber

Screen Yorkshire
46 The Calls
Leeds
LS1 7EY
Tel: 0113 294 4410
Fax: 0113 294 4989

email: info@ymtc.co.uk
Website:Screen Yorkshire

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
AddThis Feed Button

A rant by a cynical and bitter writer about the injustices in the world after someone failed to recognise his genius May 10, 2008

Posted by James D Hartland in BBC, BBC Writer's Room, Ensemble, North East Voices, Northern Voices, Rants, Rejection, Shameless, TV, Training.
3 comments

Being able to take rejection is one of the best skills you can have as a writer, because if there’s one thing you can be guaranteed it is that you will be rejected a lot.

When ever I hear writers moaning about the rejection they just got I always have serious doubts over their future in the industry, because as much as anything becoming a successful writer is about getting through all the initial rejection without going insane or giving up. One of the best compliments I’ve ever been given is being told that I seemed like the kinda guy who would never get disheartened by rejection.

I guess that is somewhat of a disclaimer because the rest of this blog is about my latest rejection and how lame it seems. I just wanna make it clear that I’m not one to moan about rejection normally, but for some reason I felt compelled to blog about this one and get it off my chest. So given this is a bit of a rant I may well sound a bit bitter and like I am complaining over nothing.

OK, so it goes like this…

I applied for the BBC training scheme called North East Voices. The application process involved writing a short logline for an original TV drama and then writing a one page synopsis of the drama. In addition to this you then had to submit a writing sample of 30 to 60 pages.

The idea I had pitched was an ensemble drama featuring 8 principle characters as well as a whole community of other characters. Think something like Shameless where is has the central family and then also has the neighbours, and the people at the pub and the corner shop, and other families, and the police and and and…. My idea wasn’t quite that big, but it was definitely an ensemble drama set in a certain large community.

So basically I had this problem of how on earth do I set that up with just one side of A4 to do it.

I’ll be honest, having never pitched an ensemble TV drama before I was a bit at a loss as to which way to set up all these different people in a way that is both clear to read and still engaging, but to do it on one single page of A4? Ouch!! It would be hard enough if I had as many pages as I needed, but 1 was gunna be hard.

I decided that since my 8 characters were forced together by outside circumstances and forced to live together that the best option would be just to set up all the main character’s and their one or two inherent flaws or quirks which would leave the reader wanting more (or so was the idea).

Eg. A had this super chavy character who was an academic genius to the bemusement of her chavy parents who can’t understand how she ended up so smart, and despite being a genius this girl spends most of her time getting into fights and going shop lifting with the chavy friends she grew up with on her estate. I ended it by saying something like “Her problem is whether she will manage to stay out of trouble long enough to graduate”.

I was kinda aware that I hadn’t really gone into the specifics of how any of these stories might develop over the series, I was instead trying to set up 8 really interesting premises that interweaved with each other that you would want to know more about. I couldnt see any other way to do it on a single side of A4.

So off I sent my application, not entirely happy but quietly confident.

Alas, I ended up only making the “long short list”. One of the perks however of being on this long short list is they gave you written feedback on your idea rather than a stock no thank you letter.

I got the feedback in a letter today and reading it gave me with no surprises over their main criticism…

The synopsis resembles a list of character bios, rather than an outline of how the series might be sustained by developing interviewing and resolving distinct character journeys.

So I guess the flaw I knew I had before I applied was what eventually screwed me??

Well, in the next paragraph of the letter it goes on to say…

If the writer shies from developing the drama inherent in such a colourful ensemble, the series may be steered toward a “sketchier” feel that is likely to run out of steam and be less gripping as a result. How might the odd co-dependence between Jenna and her priest evolve, for example? Does John’s love for Frankie remain unexpressed? [edit - then it goes on to list a question for each of the characters I wrote about]

Bottom line then, I failed to give them what they wanted. What I wrote was too much setting up my really interesting characters and not enough of what then happens to those characters. I can’t expect them to just take a leap of faith and assume that I can write all these stories in a lovely overlapping interesting way just because I can set up some interesting characters…

but at the end of the day I just can’t see how I could have done all that on one side of A4! I filled the page just describing the characters, how am I expected to then tell you how each story progresses as well?

Sure I could have just bunged a sentance at the end of each character’s paragraph that crudely sums up where they are are at the end of the series, but that isn’t going to give you a sense of how the stories evolve either, plus some characters can’t really be summed up like that.

This is where I hold my hands up and say I don’t really know enough about TV show development. Maybe all TV shows are pitched on a single side of A4 and there is just a knack of getting an ensemble drama to fit? I just feel like had it been 2 pages rather than 1then I might have been able to explain some of the developments I have in mind for the things I set up.

Please BBC Writer’s Room, make it at least 2 pages next year. OK?

I guess I’m a bit miffed that my idea seems to have been rejected as much as anything because of the restriction of having to fit an entire TV series and all its developing character arcs on a single side of A4. It seems to be that the application process for North East Voices with its one page synopsis being everything is inherently biased towards shows that have a small selection of characters and more similar content from episode to episode (like a cop show that has the same formula each week), because surely if I had set up a show with 3 characters doing the same thing each week then it would be based purely on its potential rather that what is or isn’t shoehorned into the synopsis.

But then again, maybe I just plain suck and it is entirely possible to do all this on a single side of A4 but my suckyness prevents me? I’m totally open to the idea that maybe I just suck at this. Anyone out there is welcome to leave a comment saying I’m a synopsis writing retard, but if you do then please also tell me how I should have summed up a big ensemble drama on one page in a way that gets across all their individual character developments. I’m eager to learn!

That said, this was not the only reason my application failed. The other criticism was the fact my writing sample was a feature film aimed at the US Market and thus

it’s difficult to tell whether the writer will make the adjustment to a series that specifically targets British mores and humour

Yeah because being a gruff Northerner I can only write stuff for people in California!

I wonder if the tone was really any different or whether it was more that my feature is set in a US High School which is such an intrinsically American thing that he or she assumed there was no way it could be similar to something shown on British TV.

But hey, even though I disagree with their assumption that despite being a British writer I can’t write for a British audience, the point is the writing sample was different enough that it put doubts in their mind, and perhaps ultimately they would have given me the benefit of the doubt over my 1 page synopsis had my writing sample been a similar 60 minute TV show script to the one I was pitching.

I think in order to effectively pitch TV ideas I’m gunna have to develop some TV scripts to show people, because I can only see myself running into this problem again, even if the next feature film I use is set in England! So with this in mind I might actually continue developing this idea off my own back anyways.

Also, I guess if they run the scheme again next year I will be way more concious to make sure what ever I hand in gives some indication of how the stories will progress over time!

Anyways, rant over.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
AddThis Feed Button

Too many deadlines and not enough time (Updated) May 7, 2008

Posted by James D Hartland in Deadlines, Procrastination, Training, Writer's Lifestyle.
add a comment

Arg! It seems like 90% of all the training and funding schemes that an up and coming writer would wanna get onto have deadlines during the same 5 or 6 week period of the year. It’s just a crazy period at the moment. Thing’s have been super busy for me lately and will continue to be, especially as I need to hand in a final rewrite of my LA Features script in a few weeks.

It’s kinda stupid because for months on end there has been nothing to apply for, which wasn’t a bad thing as it meant I could get on with my feature film, but it would be better if all these things were spread out more over the year.

Anyways, I need to get back to the grind stone if I am to have any chance of getting all this work done. Wish me luck. I might have to do a few all nighters in the next few weeks me thinks.

It’s days like today you regret the days you spent procrastinating ;)

Update: I thought maybe things were dying down now and it would be a while before another big splurge of schemes, but nope, every day I seem to find out about a new training or funding scheme that I would like to get onto. I’ve already had to ignore 3 of them this week as I know I just don’t have time. It’s weird that everything is coming all at once. It’s annoying too because it means you’ve gotta ignore schemes that are perfect for you just because the deadlines clash with something. Oh well. This is life I guess.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
AddThis Feed Button

I’m still alive, just busy April 20, 2008

Posted by James D Hartland in Funding, LA Features, TV, Television, Training.
add a comment

After going through a period of blogging almost every day I’ve not written much lately. A few possible topics did spring to mind but nothing uber compelling. I’ve been kinda busy.

The most interesting thing to note is over the past few weeks I’ve been working on a spec TV project which is something a bit different for me. Up until now I have pretty much only worked on short films or feature films, although I did dip my toe into some TV stuff a while back. It’s been pretty fun to work on something so different. I find some aspects of TV writing a little clunky, but I’m sure a TV writer would say the same thing about feature films.

Aside from writing I’ve been applying for several schemes, both of the training and funding kinds, so that took up a bunch of time, more time than I would have liked really. You don’t appreciate just how long it’s going to take just to fill out all the forms and get everything printed off. Now I’ve just gotta wait and hope someone sees my awesome talents.

The daft thing is if I get on any of these schemes I’m probably going to have to forgo sleep because I’ve still got a bunch on my plate with other stuff, including the LA Features scheme which is still going strong. I guess that would be a nice problem to have though, not enough time because I’ve been selected for yet another career progressing scheme.

In terms of the LA Features scheme I’ve got something like 8 or 9 weeks before I need to hand in the next draft now. I’ve got to basically go back and rewrite it from scratch though as I’ve really fallen into a black hole of not being able to take the current draft forward. It sounds like a big deal to start it again from scratch but really it’s been liberating. I now get to solve problems and come up with new killer ideas without all the baggage of the previous work to get in the way. And frankly whole sections of the old script are going to end up copied and pasted back into the new one anyways, so it’s not like I am throwing the old draft out of the window. That said though I’m still going to have to work my butt off to get it all finished on time.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
AddThis Feed Button

A review of ‘Syd Field’s Screenwriting Workshop’ DVD November 1, 2007

Posted by James D Hartland in Books, DVD, Syd Field, Theory, Training.
4 comments

sydbox_lo-res.jpgI recently acquired a copy of Syd Field’s Screenwriting Workshop DVD for a very reasonable price (free). It’s something I’ve been hoping to watch for a while just to see what it’s like, so I’ve been looking forward to writing a review of it here.

I dunno what to make of it really, its essentially a variation of Syd Field’s book “The Screen Writer’s Workbook” so the question is why not just buy the book?

That book is basically a methodical framework for working out your first draft of the film; so for example it will give you a chapter on developing your initial idea and then give you an exercise to do to develop that, then it will explain the importance of plot points and then give you an exercise to do on that. So by the end of the book you have systematically planned all the plot, the characters and so on, written the first, second and third act, and then done a rewrite of it all. The book isn’t particularly theory heavy so I don’t think you could get away with reading this one book while you write your screenplay and nothing else, but it does keep you on track and gives you a framework to develop within and for that I think its a pretty useful book regardless what level you are at.

As I say, the DVD is essentially exactly the same course, although there are slight variations in the way its taught, it’s not like a word for word recount of the book and it uses different example movies ;but at the end of the day its the same basic ideas presented in the same order.

So with this in mind is there really any advantage to getting the DVD over the book? It’s hard to say that there is really.

The DVD has this effect of making everything seem more complicated than it is. There’s just something about people speaking with lots of jargon words in quick succession that makes it harder to digest than the written form. Even though I’m very familiar with Syd Field’s theories I found myself going “huh?” just because he was speaking the theory rather than it being written down.

The DVD also comes across kinda stilted as well since its basically a static shot of Field talking straight to the camera and nothing much else. It cuts away to some really lame graphics and has bullet points appear up on the screen to highlight things he says, but you can’t help but think it would be better if he was drawing stuff on a whiteboard or pointing at something. The lack of dynamics really hurts it I think.

Also, I dunno if this is rife in his books as well and I just never picked up on it, but this guy seems to love using really lame metaphors . Like apparently structure is like a game of chess and a screenplay is like a table. And just in general, I was surprised at how badly he explained things. Maybe I just needed some more coffee before I sat down to listen to him?

So in conclusion;

I knew going into this that it would basically be a rehash of one of his other books so I don’t know exactly why I am feeling disappointed, but I am feeling disappointed by this. I think it’s because not only is this a rehash of a book but it’s actually making the information found in that book a lot worse by virtue of the stilted delivery and the fact that DVD ain’t the natural format for teaching about writing anyways.

I’m pretty sure no one I know was planning on rushing out to buy this any-time soon, but I know fair number of people will find this review via Google and for those people I recommend you just buy the book instead.

PS. As I learnt in the video Syd Field’s number plate is “Plot Pnt”. Is that just naff or so naff it’s cool?

Update: You can currently get the old version of the book on Amazon MarketPlace for 3p plus P+P! (Though that still doesn’t beat me getting What Lie did I tell for 1p last year!)

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
AddThis Feed Button